pic
When two broadcasters on Twitter or some other social media connect in the common area and create a discussion is when the magic happens. This is what social media is all about, connecting with each other and talking!...
pic
I followed a debate over Bambuser about School 2.0 at Almedalen (a camp/convention for Swedish politics). Using Bambuser was a nice touch to such a debate and the online viewers were at the start included but later on forgotten but we had our own good chat in our channel.  The debate was of varying quality but made me think about some of the things they talked about. The main thing they seemed to want to change in school 2.0 was a use of social media but unfortunately they missed the debate over what it would be used for. This miss is something I've noticed a lot lately, much discussio...
pic
Found a great manifesto expressing how I feel towards the internet. The internet is made of people. People matter. This includes you. Stop trying to sell everything about yourself to everyone. Don’t just hammer away and repeat and talk at people—talk TO people. It’s organic. Make stuff for the internet that matters to you, even if it seems stupid. Do it because it’s good and feels important. Put up more cat pictures. Make more songs. Show your doodles. Give things away and take things that are free. Look at what other people are doing, not to compete, imitate, or compare . . . but...
pic
With the emergence of new social media the gap between people seem to shrink. We share more and more about ourselves with each other over the internet and gossip has in many cases moved online. Keeping our social networks online allows us to keep track and in touch with more than the theoretical cognitive limit that we can have according to Dunbar's number (even if we may not have a 'stable social relationship' with most of them). Another interesting aspect of when clusters of people in this size form is the effect it may have on a social scale. One example of a group's altered properties c...
pic
Social Media is relatively new for most people and many are still exploring the possibilities and uses of it. One of the things that happen with social media is that we become more transparent, we share more of our self to more people then we normally do. This transparency is good in some ways and less good in some. There's been several stories of sharing too much information on social media. One example is the case where a British women forgot she had befriended her boss on Facebook. Another example is the recent case of a Swedish guy who published a picture of himself where he wore...
Jan

11

[Re-posting this since I lost my posts from my old blog. First time posted two weeks after SIME 09 this fall].

I was following the SIME Stockholm conference remotely through blogs and twitter. I was not at the conference or the workshop. The following is only my opinions based on the knowledge I got from the conference.

sime09

SIME (Scandinavian Interactive Media Event) gathers many persons that are into media and the conference is inspirational to many. These visitors then share what they learn through their own networks and knowledge is omnipresent as it should be. This is the reason I was so surprised when I saw this tweet:

RT @dustboy Huh? Transparens? RT @tjompa: Eh, reglerna för workshopen är: inga tweets & inga citat. Strange. #sime09
[Huh? Transparancy? Eh, rules for the workshop are: no tweets & no quotations. Strange.]

There was some discussion around this and since it was one of the first workshops for the SIME 09 conference some thought it might be new policy from the organizers this year but this was quickly denied through a tweet.

RT @simeblog: PLZ RT #SIME09 vill att ni twittrar . Om någon som håller i en Workshop vill annorlunda, så ber vi er att respektera det.
[SIME09 wants you to twitter. If someone organizing a workshop wants something else, we ask you to respect this.]

The workshop that applied the “no tweets and no quotations” policy was titled Changing giants – how traditional companies has transformed to digital. It was moderated by Bob Stumpel (Result) and the two experts present were Dan Ochterlony (Schibsted) and Claudia Gonzalez (UNHCR). The workshop started out with one of them saying: “I will tell you a lot and it is without sugarcoating but please don’t tweet/quote me etc” (quoted by someone that broke the rules). The question is why these persons applied the “no tweets and no quotation rule” and restricted the transparency and flow of knowledge?

A few possible explanations for the limited transparency:

1. They were over-stepping boundaries and talking about knowledge that could hurt the companies they were talking about (or themself if it came out they had revealed those “secrets”).

2. The information during the workshop was nothing new or innovating. It was shallow enough to restrict them using it again in other situations if it was shared.

Other explanations on why people want to limit the transparency at a workshop?

———————————————-

I previously (before I lost my database) got some replies on this post from Mahesh who was working at SIME. He confimed my first guess on why the limitation on transparency was implemented in that workshop. I’ll re-post part of that conversation here.

Mahesh:
Hi, thanks for pointing out the whole side of the story. As you mentioned, the moderators and experts in the workshops wanted to give their maximum knowledge and share their learnings and that included some information that is generally not shared. Hence, the no tweet policy during that particular workshop alone. And oh btw, #sime09 was the second most tweeted word during the 2 days in Scandinavia and that I believe could not have happened with a “no tweet” policy :)

Me:
This question about restricting content is very interesting seeing what is happening today. An example of this is Newscorp restricting their transparency by locking away content from google.
Would this way of making a profit be an alternative for SIME in the future? Locking content by applying a no tweet / quotation policy on some workshops / presentations and making people pay in order to take part of the content from those?

Mahesh:
Hi, I think the best things in life, especially knowledge should be free online. I think its great you are able to cover the conference without even attending it, and that is the power of spreading knowledge. A pay per view idea might not be all bad considering we have some great speakers, but we should tie it down with more interesting content and discussions to make it more meaningful for a person to engage online as much as he / she does when at the conference. Food for thought for 2010 I am sure :)

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Tags: ,

 

juli 2010
m ti o to f l s
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
CC-BY-NC-SA 2010 - Transparency, Social Media and Cultural Patterns |